Author | Thread: loss of legs doesn't equal disabled? [LOCKED] |
deathpunk Posts: 154 Location: Nournsland Magus Age: 124 years old
| Message #9177 Posted: Aug 2, 2008, 6:38 pm |
I just took out the legs on yonk's bone golem, yet it didn't end the fight and let me raid him, I guess I could be wrong but I'd thought that no legs meant disabled. edit:but when i went back to hit him again it did count him as disabled.Last Edited: Aug 2, 2008, 6:39 pm |
|
[ADMIN] ArkhamPosts: 902 Location: Mallow Magus Age: 130 years old Clan: AGOMC | Message #9290 Posted: Aug 3, 2008, 10:41 pm |
Correct behaviour. If you take out the legs during a fight, it doesn't necessarily end the fight, but it will prevent it from defending in future combats. Think of it as "still able to swing while it's down and nearby, but easy to avoid the legless wonder when you're approaching from 100ft away." Kep |
|
CommComms Posts: 392 Location: Daylsfeld Magus Age: 127 years old
| Message #9306 Posted: Aug 4, 2008, 12:12 am |
But then why does it end the combat if you remove the pelvis? |
|
[ADMIN] ArkhamPosts: 902 Location: Mallow Magus Age: 130 years old Clan: AGOMC | Message #9381 Posted: Aug 4, 2008, 6:51 pm |
A pelvis is a central component to the golem. The loss of the legs is incidental due to the hierarchy of golem parts; the reason the fight ends at that point is due to the loss of the pelvis. Kep |
|
| |
| |